Parish Council meeting minutes – 20th March 2023

BRAMLEY PARISH COUNCIL

 

Minutes of the Meeting of the Council

Date:

Monday 20th March 2023

Time:                                    7.30pm

Place:

Bramley Room, Bramley Village Hall

 

Present:

 Cllr Tony Durrant (Chair)

Cllr Chris Tomblin

 

Cllr Chris Flooks

Cllr Liz Capel

 

Cllr Malcolm Bell

Cllr Steve Day

 

Cllr Colin Shimell

 

In attendance:

Maxta Thomas (Clerk)

16 members of the public

 

Cllr Nick Robinson (Borough)

 

Apologies:

Cllr Keith Oborn

Cllr Rhydian Vaughan (County)

 

 

Action

1

Apologies for Absence

 

 

As listed above.

 

2

Declarations of Interest

 

 

·         Cllr Tomblin declared an interest in item 9.1, due to his position on the BDBC Development Control Committee.  He took no part in votes on planning applications.

 

3

Minutes of the Last Parish Council Meeting

 

3.1

The minutes of the extraordinary meeting held on 26th January 2023 were unanimously agreed as being a true record of the meeting.  

The minutes of the full council meeting on 21st February were unanimously agreed as being a true record of the meeting. 

The Chairman duly signed the minutes of both meetings. 

 

 

3.2

Matters arising

 

 

·         The BDBC grant for the AutoSpeedwatch system has not been awarded, due to HCC Highways not confirming the licensing arrangements.  It appears that the license is a grey area where there is no policy, which is being explored at present.  Once the issue is resolved, a new grant application will be made to BDBC.  The HCC Councillor grant has been agreed and paid.  Clerk to check if this needs to be returned.

 

 

 

 

Clerk

4

Open Forum

 

 

In a change to the usual forum, Cllr Durrant asked members of the public to submit any questions they might have ahead of each agenda item.

 

 

5

County Councillor Report – see appendix A. 

 

6

Borough Councillor Report – Cllr Tomblin, , and Cllr Durrant gave a verbal report.

·         BDBC has been approached by Great Wolf resorts who are looking at bringing a water resort to the borough at the current Basingstoke Golf Centre by the Leisure Park.  This would include a 500 room hotel and water activities. 

·         BDBC fund for coronation events – the deadline for applications is Friday 31st March.  Details on BDBC website

·         A report has been commissioned and received looking at solar panels on industrial rooves in the borough.  The report is on the BDBC website.

·         BDBC are launching a litter campaign for last two weeks in March.

·         From 1st May to 31st Aug bin collections will be from 6am – all bins should be put out by then.

·         BDBC has sent out a guide to recycling to whole borough.

·         Local groups are invited to nominate young people for the Basingstoke Youth Award.  The award recognises significant achievement by people who are under 18.  The deadline for nominations is 24th March

·         The Eastrop Park water fountains have now been switched off permanently as they have reached the end of their life.

·         Ward members are now to be notified when open spaces are available for adoption by either BDBC or a management company, and will be able to raise concerns.  It is hope that this will avoid double charging.

·         Scrutiny Committee terms of reference are being reviewed.

·         Election purdah starts 23rd March.

·         A resident asked about flooding in Basingstoke near where the proposed hotel is likely to be.  Cllr Tomblin responded that BDBC is looking at this.  It may have been dealt with as part of the recent Buckskin flooding works. 

·         The BDBC annual plan was put to full council and approved.  It can be viewed on the BDBC website.

 

 

7

Parish Environment

 

7.1

Air Quality monitor – future usage/positioning – following a recent councillor resignation, a new lead councillor is required for the AQ monitor, particularly with regards to the data monitoring.  Bramley PC is also looking at moving the unit from its present location.  It was noted that permission will be required from whoever owns the post that the unit is placed on.  It was also noted that this will incur a cost for a new installation elsewhere.  To be reviewed at the April meeting. 

 

 

 

 

Clerk

7.2

Coronation Event – Sherfield Parish Council are looking at giving mugs to under  18s in the Parish.  It was suggested that Bramley and Sherfield could make this a joint venture.  Distribution could perhaps be via the school.  Clerk to make enquiries with Sherfield Parish Council

The Church want to hold a Celebration of Flowers from 6-8th May.  Cllr Day will work with the Church on a grant application. 

A commemoration plaque to celebrate both the coronation and the  life of Queen Elizabeth II was suggested.

The village fete is scheduled for the weekend after the coronation – it was suggested that the PC could take a stand and have a raffle where proceeds go to the King’s favourite charities. 

A resident suggested a mini Stonehenge type stone commemorating the Queen and the population of Bramley at the time, followed by King Charles, and with spaces for future monarchs.  This will be explored. 

 

 

Clerk

 

Cllr Day

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clerk

8

Clerk’s report & Administration

 

8.1

Parish magazine article – the next issue will be the May issue, and Cllr Shimell will write the article.  The deadline is 15th April 2023. 

Cllr Shimell

8.2

Casual Vacancy – the Clerk noted the resignation of Bruce Ansell from the Parish Council.  The statutory notice has been forwarded to Electoral Services at BDBC, and has been displayed on the PC noticeboards and is on the PC website.

 

9

Planning (see Appendix C)

 

9.1

 

New Applications 

None.

 

9.2

Planning Appeals Update

 

 

21/03758/OUT – Land At Stocks Farm The Street – Outline planning permission (with all matters reserved except for access) for the demolition of one dwelling and erection of up to 140 dwellings and a community building of up to 250sqm under Use Class E, together with sports and leisure facilities – Planning Inspectorate reference APP/H1705/W/22/3302752

·         The appeal hearing took place in January.  A decision is expected in due course. Update: Since the meeting the Governments planning Inspector has approved the application

 

10

Reports

 

10.1

Allotments & Burial Ground

         i.            St James Park allotments update – the handover of the allotments from Persimmon to Bramley PC is now very close.  All items requested have now been resolved, apart for the delivery and spread of topsoil.  Persimmon’s contractor has said that they cannot do this before the w/b 3rd April; however, Persimmon are trying to bring this forward.  Once this done and the lease is finalised, the PC contractor will get on site to lay out the allotments and install a second water trough.  It appears that the allotments will not be ready for tenancy by 31st March, as hoped, but it should be soon after.

Cllr Durrant recorded thanks to Cllr Shimell, Cllr Tomblin and the Clerk for their work facilitating the St James Park allotment work. 

A resident asked what the position was with the Clift Meadow path.  Cllr Durrant responded – the lights installed are still not working, although the PC is pressing Persimmon to resolve this. 

 

 

10.2

Village Hall Trust – see appendix A. 

 

10.3

Clift Meadow Trust – see appendix A.  Cllr Capel gave a verbal update.

·          The energy grant is now in the bank

·         The chairs have now been replaced.

·         CMT are still looking at a possible kick wall. 

 

10.4

Police & Neighbourhood Watch – see appendix A.

 

10.5

Highways & Footpaths – see appendix A. 

Cllr Durrant noted various roadworks around the parish and surrounding areas.

Clerk to chase Highways about the missing traffic calming bollards.

 

 

Clerk

10.6

Chairman’s Report

         i.            Resident letter to BDBC re housing numbers (see appendix B) – the resident noted housing numbers and lack of infrastructure.  He stated that Bramley has been subjected to unprecedented housing building, which is being used to compensate for the wider BDBC shortfall. 

Cllr Bell feels that Bramley PC should approach officers on a case by case basis and show them the problems that Bramley faces. 

Cllr Tomblin noted (in his ward councillor role) that there are possible opportunities to challenge policies in the ongoing Local Plan Update.  In particular, the housing numbers calculation is being challenged.  Cllr Durrant stated that the shortfall in the 5 year land supply is a big issue for Bramley and other parishes.  Cllr Robinson observed that applications are going to appeal because of the ’tilted balance’ which the planning inspector has to consider.  He also noted that any previous over-delivery does not have an effect on the current 5 year housing land supply. 

A resident noted that Bramley has become a hub for the surrounding small villages, which is what has led to problems.  They asked if a joint approach from Bramley and small parishes would be effective, particularly on road infrastructure. 

       ii.            Statement re Facebook Bramley Community page – the Chairman made a statement regarding recent postings on the Bramley Community Facebook page.  He noted that as a rule Bramley PC does not respond to FB chatter but the tone and content in this instance has made a public response necessary.  He further noted that only one resident contacted the Parish Council directly concerning the allegations made on FB.  The rest of the contributors chose to base their allegations, abuse, attempted intimidation and libellous remarks on the unsubstantiated allegations of one resident, who was supported by the Group Administrator.

Cllr Durrant went on to state that he and the other Councillors and Clerk are loyal to the Bramley community.  He noted that Councillors have dedicated significant time and effort free of charge, some of them for many years.  He stated that he is very proud the Councillors, as should the community be.

Cllr Durrant observed that Bramley PC is totally transparent in its activities. There are very tight national regulations which Bramley PC adheres to, and the finances and mode of working are audited every year by both internal and external audits.  There is no question of financial impropriety at any time.  Bramley PCs financial management is considered exemplary, with, for example, a completely clear external audit for 2021-22.  Accounts and bank statements are reviewed at public full council meetings each month and are included in the minutes which are published on the Bramley PC website.

Cllr Durrant stated that no financial transaction is finally decided upon anywhere else but at these monthly public meetings.  Matters are discussed as and when throughout the month so that Councillors are prepared for discussions and decision making at meetings, all of which is standard practice for Local Authorities.

     iii.            Statement re Grant requests – the Chairman made a statement regarding how grant requests are handled.  Grant requests are received by the Clerk, and are rarely unexpected – usually there is a discussion by email and or the phone with the applicant.  The first action taken by the Council is a review by the Clerk to determine if the PC can lawfully give the grant.  If not the applicant is advised that the grant request cannot be accepted. This saves every one time and dos not set false expectations.

If the PC can lawfully consider a proposal the Cllrs are advised immediately by email of the content and the Clerks  determination of lawfulness,  so that they can prepare for a discussion at this meeting.  Cllrs are free to express their views, ask questions and form their opinions.     

The applicant will during this time finalise and submit the request form.  It is only when the form is submitted and reviewed that a final decision will be made at a public full council meeting.  No money is given out until this has happened.  The Clerk monitors the process to ensure we are compliant with regulations and our code of conduct.  Any claim that Bramley PC has decided a grant ‘behind closed doors’ is unfounded.

     iv.            Final statement – the Chairman made a final summing up statement.  Cllr Durrant noted that there is clearly a lack of understanding of the process within parts of the community.  Bramley PC follows the rules and is totally transparent in its activities at all times.  Allegations to the contrary are unfounded, spurious and benefit no one.

He encouraged residents to come to meetings, check the PC website, and to contact the PC if they have any queries.  Contact details are available and appear every month in the Bramley Magazine which is delivered to every household.

       v.            Cllr Durrant stated that contributors on the FB thread have not carried out any due diligence but rather have joined in with those with a vested interest in their own agenda.  They know that Bramley PC cannot and will not  respond on Facebook.  Bramley PC will not tolerate abuse, lies, libellous comment and misinformation but normally can only respond on its’ own social media, web-site or at the monthly public meeting.  Bramley PC will not be a victim of toxic personal agendas, hence the statements being made at this meeting. 

The FB group administrators first duty is to uphold the rules and guidelines which control the group’s activities.  The community look to the Group Administrator for protection from abuse, bullying, intimidation and misinformation, and also to see fair play.  On this occasion he has allowed unevidenced and unjustified abuse of the Parish Council. 

Cllr Durrant asked that the FB Group administrator allows the PC to respond to the posts in an honest, open and transparent way and that that response will be shared with all members.  The PC will never attack or abuse members but wish to have the right to offer facts.  Cllr Durrant plans to meet with the FB group administrator to discuss the issues raised. Update: Since the meeting a request to speak with the Administrator was made and we are still awaiting a promised response.

     vi.            A resident noted that she has attended meetings for years, and stated that Bramley PC has been very open and always willing to discuss and issues.  She thanked the PC for their work. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cllr Durrant

11

Consultation documents requiring consideration

 

11.1

Draft Guidance on Planning Obligations and Infrastructure Requirements – details of this HCC consultation has been distributed to all Councillors.  The deadline for comments is 31st March.  All councillors to review and send comments to Clerk, who will collate and submit as necessary.

 

 

All

12

Grant Applications

 

12.1

Bramley Solar Farm Residents Group (BSFRG) – this application for funding has now been withdrawn. 

Non-financial support for Solar Farm judicial review –  Cllr Durrant noted that a judicial review challenges the process of the appeal, rather than the decision, and  that there were issues with the appeal process in this instance.  He stated that Bramley PC always looks for a fair hearing for Bramley residents. 

Cllr Tomblin agreed that the planning inspector responses and practices were not necessarily in line with due process.  He also noted that the BDBC legal team did not necessarily give the robust defence of the refusal that may be expected.  He feels that weight given to green energy against the harm on the landscape and archaeological features was unbalanced. 

Cllr Durrant stated that BDBC were asked if they would support a judicial review.  BDBC did not seek a legal opinion, but used their own planning and governance experts, who refused to do it, mainly on the grounds of cost. 

It was noted that BSFRG has sought a legal opinion which states there is a case to be made.  The BSFRG group led judicial review is a continuation of the Rule 6 status they had at appeal. 

Cllr Shimell noted that he did not recall concerns raised at the time of the appeal, only that it seemed much more informal than other appeals.  He feels that much of the current comment is due to hindsight. 

A resident asked about the recent resignation of a councillor, seemingly associated with this issue.  Cllr Durrant responded that the ex-councillor’s reasons were his own, and that he should be asked directly about these.  It is not for the Parish Council to comment on these reasons. 

A resident questioned whether Bramley PC should be meeting with developers to try and obtain something of value for Bramley out of any possible development.  Cllr Durrant stated that Bramley PC does already do this, regardless of whether the PC is likely to be pro or anti the proposals on the table.  He also noted that the expansion of the Clift Surgery was as a result of negotiations with the developer of St James Park. 

Cllr Durrant proposed that Bramley PC support (not financially) Solar Farm judicial review process.  Cllr Bell seconded.  Cllr Capel abstained from the vote, and Cllr Shimell voted against the motion.  All other Councillors voted for the motion, which was carried.

 

13

Finance

 

13.1

Approval of payments (see appendix C) – the Clerk has circulated the list of payments for approval.  Cllr Tomblin proposed and Cllr Day seconded that the March payments be approved.  Unanimously agreed.  Clerk to process.  The Clerk noted two other payments due that were not on the statement.  Cllr Shimell has claimed £68.99 for a new padlock for the St James Park allotments, and a further invoice for £36 is expected from DCK Payroll Solutions for the year end payroll processing. These were also approved.

 

 

Clerk

13.2

Receipts – the receipts were noted.

 

14

Date of Next meeting

 

 

The next full Parish Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday 18th April 2023, with Planning Committee the week before on Tuesday 11th April 2023.  The Annual Parish Meeting will be held on Tuesday 25th April.

 

15

Resolution to exclude press and public from items that may require discussion of possible legal and financial proceedings 

 

 

None.

 

16

Confidential Items

 

 

None.

 

 

The meeting closed at 9.48pm

 

 

 

 

 

Signed:                 ………………………………………………………………….      Date: ………………………………………              

(Chairman)
Appendix A – March Briefing notes

 

COMMUNITY SPEEDWATCH

Concerning speeds – As more data is collected the three hot spots appear to be The Street (Village Hall), Farriers/Smithy (from the 40/30mph transition) and East of Bramley Corner (Bramley Sign) East bound The Speed Camera should provide a deterrent by the Village Hall. Given the data from Farriers and The Smithy I would recommend considering extending the 30 mph Zone (restricted area) to the East of the Round about by Campbell Road would likely help the situation.

With regard to East of Bramley Corner; the area is not suitable for a camera due to the tree density.

SIDs – Both SIDs were in use throughout February at various locations throughout the Village. See Table 1. The Village Hall location continues to be used with the aim to obtaining base line information to compare with Camera output data once installed.

I have added the V85 and Average speed data to Table 1. V85: 85% of vehicles are driving slower or exactly this speed.

Recent Local SpeedWatch Activity  –3 Manned Deployments were carried out during January, 1 by Farriers Close and 2 by the Village Hall (all westbound traffic flow) .The Details of 30 vehicles were passed onto the Police. Max speed recorded during the deployments was 44mph. A total of 322 vehicles were checked during the deployments

Equipment  -The SpeedGun continues to be a good asset.

General – Have put a call out for additional volunteers in the Bramley Magazine.

It is intended to support the Village Fete again this year with a similar set up to last year.

I had 1 email, via the Bramley Magazine, from someone complaining that the data presented in the Magazine “irritated them. Bizarrely the person admitted in the same email that he exceeds the speed limit through the village but because it was only a small amount it was somehow “acceptable”. I did reply pointing out that the speed limit is set under a legal frame work and is quite clear. I have had a meeting with the Magazine Editor regarding the issue.

AutoSpeedWatch – I have written to the Police commissioner to see if she can assist with the information required from Highways regarding the SpeedCamera. I have sent the response to Maxta.

 

 

 

ALLOTMENTS/BURIAL GROUND

No written report received.

 

VILLAGE HALL TRUST

Nothing to report.

 

CLIFT MEADOW TRUST

No written report received.

 

POLICING & NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH

No written report received

 

HIGHWAYS/FOOTPATHS

No written report received. 

 

BOROUGH COUNCILLOR REPORT

No written report received.

 

COUNTY COUNCILLOR REPORT

  1. 2023/24 budget approved – Hampshire County Council’s £2.6bn spending plans for 2023/24 have been approved. I outlined these plans in my report last month. Its council tax precept for the financial year beginning 1 April 2023, will increase by a total of 4.99%, of which 2% will go specifically towards adults’ social care, in line with Government policy. This equates to an annual charge of £1,460.25 for a Band D property – an increase of £69.45 per year or approximately £1.34 a week.

Leader of the County Council, Councillor Rob Humby, said: “Each year, the County Council is tested to the limits in continuing to deliver a balanced budget, which is required by law. Planning for this upcoming financial year has been no different, and we have had to navigate further intense pressures resulting from the cost-of-living crisis, inflation and workforce pressures which are pushing up costs, and growing demand in key areas such as social care for the most vulnerable children and adults in our communities – which far outweighs available Government funding.

“We are also acutely aware of the very difficult decisions Hampshire residents face in their own household budgets to make ends meet, but reluctantly, in order to help deliver a balanced budget for 2023/24, we have no other choice but to increase the council tax precept. This is a decision we have not taken lightly. But even after this increase, we are still left with a £50.8 million shortfall in our revenue budget which we will have to fill using our reserves – built to buffer this and next year’s anticipated budget shortfalls.”

The increase will generate £37m of vital extra income towards the delivery of crucial, high performing services to the people of Hampshire in 2023/24, and still means that Hampshire has one of the lowest council tax precepts of any county in England.

  1. Schools – More than 97 per cent of parents in Hampshire have been offered a place for their child at one of their three preferences for a secondary school in September 2023, with 90 per cent offered a place at their first preference school. The County Council received 15,400 on-time applications this year – an increase of 418 applications compared to the number received for places in September 2022 (14,982).

Parents and carers who have not secured a place at one of their preferred secondary schools this year are urged to please visit HCC’s website for advice and guidance on their options.  The Admissions Team is busy processing primary school applications with school place offers due to go out to parents on 17 April 2023.

An interesting point to note – at the time of the implementation of the SEN Reforms in 2014, Hampshire County Council was supporting around 5,000 children with special educational needs. Since the reforms, this figure has risen to over 15,000 children. Such increases do place significant pressure on local authorities’ ability to provide support.

  1. Parish lengthsman scheme – The County Council’s parish lengthsman scheme has been maintained for the coming financial year. The term ‘lengthsman’ dates back to the 1800s, referring to workers who were responsible for keeping a particular length of road neat and tidy. The modern role of Parish Lengthsman was reintroduced in Hampshire in 2010, in order to give communities more say in how their local area is maintained.

The scheme funds a local ‘lengthsman’ to carry out straightforward and low risk maintenance activities on footways, highways, and rights of way. The work mainly involves jobs that can have a big impact, such as ditch clearing, hedge cutting and sign cleaning. The scheme has since been successful in giving 186 local parish and town councils an opportunity to prioritise and deliver their own small scale highway maintenance works that will be of high value locally. I have continually strived to keep this system going in the face of cost reductions and I am encouraged that we so far succeed.

  1. Grants to fight rural crime – The Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, Donna Jones, has announced a fund to award grants to help tackle rural crime, supporting initiatives to reduce rural crime or support victims. The application window closes at 2pm on Friday 21 April 2023 and successful applications will be announced in mid to late May 2023. Applications can be made at https://www.hampshire-pcc.gov.uk/safer-together/funding/apply-for-funding .
  2. Consultation on post-16 transport policy

The County Council has launched its annual consultation on the Post-16 Transport Policy. This policy outlines the provision of transport for young people over the age of 16 with special needs or disabilities, who require additional support to access education or training suitable to their needs.

The consultation includes an opportunity to comment on the proposed increase in the parental contribution by 27.1%, in line with the increased costs of running the service. This increase is being driven by national driver shortages, a limited number of transport operators on the market, and an increase in fuel prices. Families in receipt of income-based free school meals and certain means-tested benefits will not be required to pay an annual charge.

The consultation will run for a period of six weeks until 11:59pm on Sunday 2 April, please

visit the Hampshire County Council website for details.

  1. Coronation grants – A new grant window for Hampshire County Councillors will open from 1st to 21st April. ‘Member’s Grants for the Coronation’ will offer grants up to £1k to support local events. You can see details at https://www.hants.gov.uk/community/grants/grants-list/county-councillor

 

Cllr Rhydian Vaughan

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix B – Letter from BDBC in response to resident letter on Housing numbers

From: Cllr Simon Minas-Bound <Cllr.Simon.Minas-Bound@basingstoke.gov.uk>
Date: 10 March 2023 at 11:47:49 GMT
To:
Cc: Cllr Tony Durrant <Cllr.Tony.Durrant@basingstoke.gov.uk>, Cllr Chris Tomblin <Cllr.Chris.Tomblin@basingstoke.gov.uk>, Cllr Nick Robinson <Cllr.Nick.Robinson@basingstoke.gov.uk>,
Subject: Re: Bramley

Dear

Thank you for bringing this oversight to my attention.

Probably the best way to respond to your various points to start with is that like many I completely understand the frustration that parish councillors and borough councillors can feel with the current planning system.

I am on record stating my personal view that penalties like the 5 year housing land supply when, as a local planning authority we have given many permissions, is completely unfair.  I am pleased that we appear to be winning on this point with central government.

Indeed much of what would help both parishes and the borough do appear to have been heard in the potential planning changes including those recently published in the NPPF changes that were recently out for consultation.

Localism versus central government strategies and policies.  Although I don’t think it should pass any of us by, as local councillors, that much of our role is to make difficult, and often unpopular decisions, when it comes to planning and the need to build houses for those with a need for homes.

At BDBC we have done more than our fair share and that has, and I’m sure, will continue to cause tensions between different parts of our borough.  East versus West, Urban versus Rural, North versus South. Differences in views about strategies for delivery also cause disagreement small sites versus large strategic sites like Manydown.

Infrastructure is a key issue in all of discussions around housebuilding and of course we all only so much influence around when the infrastructure providers and developers deliver on what they promise.  Two thirds of the ward I represent is new build and I am therefore acutely aware of those promises, agreements and commitments made. It is what drove me to stand as a borough councillor having campaigned for infrastructure to be delivered.  We are looking hard at what levers we have in our control and how best to influence infrastructure delivery whilst we are not directly responsible for its deliver.  We will continue to fight for this even if we do have at least one hand tied behind our back.

Large strategic sites like Manydown come with their own unique set of problems as has proven to be the case.  Everyone in the borough is very keen to “get on with it” as you state and we are doing just that.  As the history of Manydown shows, what is perceived by many as easy and the answer to many things, can in fact be very difficult and end up doing exactly the opposite of what was intended.  With the current challenges being around the land option that was signed in 1996.  I can’t go into a huge level of depth on this for commercially sensitive reasons, but rest assured your borough councillors are aware of the challenges. I personally believe putting our eggs all in the Manydown basket in the last local plan was a strategic error that was entirely predictable and we must learn the lessons from that as we progress with the next local plan.

From your letter I of course pick up your over riding sense of frustration.  I feel much of that too at the pace of change on the planning reforms but take some solace from the changes that we are starting to see in the planning amendments which may well be given to us and the importance that continues to be given to neighbourhood plans.

Our officers are always keen to offer help and support during the process.  Along with my colleagues I continue to lobby ministers and MPs on these matters

Best Regards

 

Cllr Simon Minas-Bound

Sherborne St John and Rooksdown ward

Leader of the Council 

Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council  (he/him)

Mobile  07879 477696                                                                                                     

Twitter  @SimonBound 

Facebook  @cllr.simon.bound

 

Representing Sherborne St John and Rooksdown Ward – including Charter Alley, Monk Sherborne, 

Marnel Park, Merton Rise, Ramsdell, Rooksdown, Sherborne Fields, Sherborne St John and West Heath. 

 

 

 

Appendix C – Finance

 The March finance statement can be viewed here.